In this week's installment, Professor Finz talks about two product liability cases from
November. The first, Conte v. Weyeth, was the subject of a number of blog posts, including my two, here and here. The second is Sarti v. Salt Creek, dealing with food poisoning and breach of warrant.
Listen by clicking here.
« This Just In: Supreme Court Rules Statute Means What It Says | Main | Want A Great Big Verdict Against The State of Califoria? Go to Nevada »
January 30, 2009
The comments to this entry are closed.
Categories
- Anti-Trust Litigation (4)
- Appellate Law (19)
- Arbitration and Mediation (25)
- Asbestos Litigation (15)
- Attorneys' Fees (4)
- Business Litigation (16)
- California Courts (66)
- Civil Procedure and Discovery (58)
- Constitutional Litigation (1)
- Construction Law (3)
- Consumer and Class Litigation (67)
- Current Affairs (13)
- Damages (11)
- DRI Product Liability Conference (10)
- Employment Litigation (35)
- Federal Courts (7)
- Food and Drink (2)
- FSAB Standard No. 5 / Topic 450 (4)
- Insurance Law (2)
- Internet Law (3)
- IP Law (1)
- Mediation (5)
- Medicare Recovery (4)
- MMSEA (4)
- Music (9)
- Off-Topic Humor (2)
- Personal Injury Law (8)
- PodCasts (4)
- Preemption (2)
- Privacy (1)
- Product Liability Litigation (75)
- Proposition 65 (73)
- Punitive Damages (17)
- Science (3)
- Science and the Law (11)
- Settlements (15)
- Smart legislation (3)
- Sports (5)
- Stupid Lawsuits (7)
- Stupid legislation (4)
- Stupid Products (1)
- Tort Law (10)
- Toxic Tort Litigation (24)
- Trial Practice (2)
- Unfair Competition Law (2)
- Verdicts (39)
- Weblogs (1)
Comments