« San Francisco Tobacco Verdict: $2.5 Million; Punitives Yet to Be Decided | Main | White Papers Available »

May 17, 2007

Comments

michael walsh

That's a two-edged sword. Civil Code sec. 1717 and the cases interpreting it would almost certainly make this fee shifting provision reciprocal. Thus, if the arb agreement is shaky, and the plaintiff beats the petition or motion to compel, they should recover interim fees against the company.

The comments to this entry are closed.

My Photo

Your email address:


Powered by FeedBlitz

Blog powered by Typepad