« Court of Appeal Extends Baxter Decision, Allowing Declaratory Relief Against Bounty Hunter | Main | Cal Supremes Hear Argument On Choice of Law In Toxic Tort Case »

January 08, 2010

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451e4e569e20120a7b7faae970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Don't Mess With Chuck:

Comments

DensityDuck

? I'm shocked to see a purported legal-matters blog be so wrong on a well-established issue. Look up "model release".

The name "Chuck Yeager" has a lot of positive associations--obviously the case, because why else would his name be used in advertising? And Virgin America is clearly expecting to derive some positive financial benefit from those associations. Why shouldn't they compensate Yeager in some way for doing this?

The comments to this entry are closed.

My Photo

Citations in Cal Biz Lit

Your email address:


Powered by FeedBlitz

May, 2009 Posts at CalBizLitAfterHours

Blog powered by Typepad