« Blockbuster Punitive Damage Awards: California Leads The Way! | Main | The Year In Great Big California Verdicts »

December 14, 2009


Martin Adler, Esq.

Interesting. NJ state courts follow the same doctrine (R. 4:26-4), but it is not enough to just name John Does 1-100, you must describe the John Doe defendants by their presumed role (e.g., "believed to be manufacturers, distributors, etc.").

The comments to this entry are closed.

My Photo

Citations in Cal Biz Lit

Your email address:

Powered by FeedBlitz

May, 2009 Posts at CalBizLitAfterHours

Blog powered by Typepad