Punitive Damages Exceeding Compensatory Damages Held Violation of Due Process
I've been in China for twelve days, completely removed from blogging (and any news other than state-run television and the People's Daily), and have much catching up to do. With something like 600 posts in my reader, I despair of ever catching up. However, there are a few developments that caught my attention.
The first one appears in Jet Source Charter, Inc. v. Dougherty, where the Court of Appeal held that a $26 million punitive damage award violated the due process requirements of Campbell v. State Farm when the compensatory damage award, including pre-judgment interest, was $6.5 million. The Court held that the award was impermissibly excessive for just three reasons: (1) the compensatory award was already substantial; (2) the harm caused was solely economic (this was essentially a breach of fiduciary / fraud case involving business transactions) and (3) the plaintiff was not a particularly vulnerable victim.
Sean Martin, who manages to blog about nearly every appellate decision in California, sets forth the opposing view here.
Given the amounts involved, I'm betting on a petition to the California Supremes. And I'm further betting that the decision sticks.

Comments